Friday, August 30, 2013

Financial Innovation Appendix


Appendix 4A

 

Interest Rate Swap

 

The following diagram is from Larry Wall and John Pringle, “Interest Rate Swaps” in Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Financial Derivatives, p. 73 Chart 2:


Widgets Unlimited borrows an amount in its own credit market where it is charged a floating rate of LIBOR plus .5%. OneState Insurance lends in its market at LIBOR plus .25%. Widgets contracts with DomBank to pay a fixed rate of 9.5% and receive floating LIBOR in return. Widgets has been able to convert its floating rate, the only one available in its market into a fixed 10% loan. OneState contracts with DomBank to receive 9.4% in return for paying floating LIBOR in return. OneState has been able to convert the receipts from its loan asset from LIBOR plus .25% to a fixed 9.65% return.  DomBank earns a .1% spread, the difference between the fixed rate it receives and the rate it pays as its compensation for arranging the swap.

 




 
Appendix 4B
 
The Financial Zoo
 
The following are lists of some of the important option and swap variations arising during and since the 1980s; these are by no means all inclusive.
 
The basic call and put option on stocks gave rise to the following innovations:[1]
Options on Bonds
Options on Interest Rate Swaps
Options on stock indices and stock index futures
Down and Out Call Options – identical to European call except that the contract is cancelled if the stock price goes below a specified lower boundary
Up and Out Put Options - the put counterpart for the down and out call
Compound Options – options which allow the holder the right to purchase or sell another option.
Bermudan Options – allows the holder to exercise the option only on specific dates, usually used with fixed income instruments
Digital/Binary Options – pays a fixed amount if the option expires in the money, regardless of the expiration price of the underlying asset
Pay Later Options – no premium must be paid until expiration; however the option must be exercised if the value of the underlying asset is equal to or greater than the strike price
Delayed Option – allows the holder to receive another option at expiration with strike price set equal to underlying asset price
Chooser Option – allows the holder to choose at expiration whether the option is a call or a put at the given exercise price
Power Option – allows the holder the payoffs of a standard option but with the value of the underlying security raised to some power
Average Rate (Asian) Option – pays the difference between the strike price and the average price of the asset over the option period
Look Back Option – allows the holder to purchase or sell the underlying at the best price (maximum or minimum) over the option’s life
Ratchet Option – the strike price is reset to be equal to the underlying asset price on a predetermined set of dates
Ladder Option – variation of ratchet but is reset only if certain higher prices are reached
Barrier Option – after the initial strike price is set, another level is established whereby if the underlying reaches that price the option is cancelled
Rainbow Option – payoff is determined by the highest price at expiration attained by two or more underlying assets
Spread Option – payoff is the difference in the prices of two underlying assets
Quanto Option – payoff depends both on the underlying price and the size of the exposure as a function of that underlying price
 
The basic swap types gave birth to the following variants:[2]
Amortizing Swaps
Deferred Accelerated Cash Flow swaps
Deferred Starts, Spreadlock and Forward Swaps
Extendible and Concertina Swaps
Basis Swaps
Arrears Reset Swaps
Yield Curve Swaps
Index Differential swaps
Options on Swaps/Swaptions
Callable, Puttable and Extendable Swaps
Contingent Swaps
Rally Participation Swaps
Interest Rate Linked Swap Hybrids
Currency Linked Swap Hybrids
Cross Market Hybrids
Equity Swaps
Equity Linked Security Swaps
Commodity Swaps
Commodity Linked Security Swaps
Inflation Swaps
 
 
Appendix 4C
Collateralized Mortgage Obligation
A CMO is constructed as follows:
 
1. A special purpose entity (SPE) is designed to acquire a portfolio of mortgage-backed securities.
2. The SPE issues bonds to investors in exchange for cash, which is used to purchase the portfolio of underlying assets.
3. The bonds issued are in layers with different risk characteristics called tranches. Senior tranches are paid from the cash flows from the underlying assets before the junior tranches. Losses are first borne by the junior tranches, and then by the senior tranches.
4. The payments are governed by a prepayment schedule. The following example is given by Livingston.[3] The first 25% of payments pay off the principal of tranche 1 and future interest payments to tranche 1 are reduced. When the entire tranche 1 principal is paid the tranche ceases to exist; the next 25% of principal payments is allocated to tranche 2 etc. The low end is occupied by the Z bond, the lowest priority class, which accrues interest until all other classes are repaid their principal.
There are a number of common CMO variations. Some pools have a planned amortization class with a fixed principal payment schedule that must be met before other classes receive principal payments. Some have principal only and interest only classes. As scheduled prepayments occur, the holders of POs receive the added cash flows and the holders of IOs receive reduced interest payments. With falling interest rates prepayments are faster than anticipated and the PO value rises; with rising interest rates the value of POs drops.[4]

 
Appendix 4D
Black-Scholes Formula
 
Black and Scholes derived a partial differential equation, now called the Black–Scholes equation, which governs the price of the option over time. The derivation can be found in a number of works on option and derivative pricing. The following gives the equation and solution for call options the derivation of which is given in Briys and Bellalah at al. The model variables are:
c: call price
S: underlying asset price
K: strike price
r: riskless interest rate
t: time
t*: option maturity date
σ: volatility of underlying asset
T = t* - t
 
The underlying assumptions are:
Option is European – option can be exercised only on its expiration date (not before as in the case of an American type option)
Interest rate over the option lifetime is known
Underlying asset follows a random walk with variance proportional to square root of the price
No dividends or distributions
No transactions costs
Short selling is allowed
Trading takes place continuously
 
Under these assumptions Black and Scholes obtained the following partial differential equation:
[1/2]σ2S2  2c(S,t) – rc (S,t) + ∂c(S,t) + rS ∂c(S,t) = 0
                   ∂S2                            ∂t               ∂S
 
with boundary condition
c (S, t*) = max [0, St* - K]
A simple substitution transforms this into a form of the heat transfer equation* of thermodynamics:
∂y = 2 y
∂t     ∂S2     
 
Applying the solution to the heat transfer equation Black and Scholes obtain their famous equation:
c( S, T) = S N(d1) – K e-rT  N(d2)
with
d1 =   1     [ln (S/K) + (r + [1/2]σ2) T]
        σ √T   
 
d2 = d1 – σ √T              
 
 
 



 
 

 
N(d) is the cumulative normal density function.[5]
 
* The heat transfer equation describes the change in temperature with time along a rod or wire (one-dimensionally). Here y is the temperature, S is the distance from a heat source along the rod and t is time. The process is one of slow diffusion along the length so that the temperature is assumed to change sufficiently slowly.

Appendix 4E

 

Modern Portfolio Theory

 

The theory is based on the following underlying assumptions:


1. Risk of a portfolio is measured by the standard deviation of returns.

2. Investors are risk averse.

3. Investors utility functions are concave and increasing.

4. Investors are rational and seek to maximize their portfolio return for a given level of risk.

 

Under these assumptions we have the following:[6]

Portfolio expected return:


E(rP) = Ʃi xi E(ri)

where

xi: fraction of portfolio invested in security i

ri: return on security i

 

Thus, the expected value of the portfolio return is a weighted average of the individual securities expected returns.

 

Portfolio variance:


σ2(rP) = Ʃi xi2 σi2 + Ʃi Ʃj≠i xi xj σi σj ρij
 
The variance of the portfolio return is equal to the sum of the variances of the individual securities returns (first summation) plus the sum of the covariances of the individual securities returns (double summation).
 
When the expected portfolio returns are plotted against the risk, as measured by the standard deviation for a portfolio with no holdings of a risk-free asset and with short selling permitted, a graph similar to the following is obtained. All possible portfolios are contained on the inside of the backward bending hyperbolic curve. Combinations along the curve represent portfolios with lowest risk for each expected return. The most efficient portfolios are on the upper part of the curve itself. Any portfolio not on the upper part is inferior to another since these have the highest returns for any specified level of risk.
 
 

The simplest form of the Capital Asset Pricing Model assumes the existence of a risk free asset. It can be shown that the portfolio in the efficient set with the highest value of the following ratio will be optimal:
 
[E(rP) – rF] / σ(rP)
 
where rF is the return on the risk free asset.
 

The point on the curve tangent to a line drawn from the risk free return rF on the vertical axis will represent the optimal portfolio.


 








[1] From Robert Tompkins, Options Analysis, Chicago, Probus, 1994.
[2] From Satyajit Das, Swap & Derivative Financing, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1994.

[3] Livingston, Money and Capital Markets, p. 342.

 [4] Ibid, pp. 343-45.

[5] Eric Briys, at al. Options, Futures and Exotic Derivatives, New York, Wiley, 1998, pp. 92-95.
[6] For a full description see Robert Haugen, Modern Investment Theory, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall, 1993, chapter 4.

 

 

 

 

 















 

 



 

No comments:

Post a Comment